Strategic Engagement of the Science-Business Media

Authors

  • Moira A. Gunn University of San Francisco School of Management 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb518

Keywords:

bio-entrepreneurship, science-business media, science-business journalists, biotechnology media, media strategies, media model

Abstract

As surely as the bio-enterprise can benefit from positive media coverage, it cannot thrive in the face of unanswered negative and/or inaccurate media attention. On all counts, the bio-enterprise must be able to strategically engage with the media at every stage in its life cycle. This article describes the global science-business media landscape, including traditional media and emergent social media and information in the online space. Current research is used to document the interdependence of media, how sources of information feed media coverage, the challenges of science communication in the broader context of business, and the effect of media engagement by the CEO.

A strategic model is presented which relates the bio-enterprise to global media, providing a larger framework within which to develop media action plans at critical junctures in the life of the bio-enterprise. Further documented is the difference between journalistic and non-journalistic media, and how journalistic ethics and standards guidelines work with ethical persuasion practices to the benefit of the bio-enterprise.

Author Biography

  • Moira A. Gunn, University of San Francisco School of Management 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117
    Dr. Moira Gunn founded and directs the Business of Biotechnology Program in the School of Management at the University of San Francisco, where she is an assistant professor. A former NASA scientist and engineer, she is producer and host of Tech Nation and its regular segment BioTech Nation, which air on the National Public Radio 24-hour Program Stream, among other venues. Dr. Gunn holds a patent in a human nutrition research measurement system, and is a member of the board of the BayBio Institute.

References

Messner, M. and DiStaso, M.W. (2008) The Source Cycle: How traditional media and weblogs use each other as sources. Journalism Studies 9(3): 447-463.

Messner, M. and Garrison, B. (2011) Study shows some blogs affect traditional news media agendas. Newspaper Research Journal 32(3): 112-126.

Hong, J. and Sheehy, M. (2010) Growing number of bloggers see their work as journalism. Newspaper Research Journal 31(4): 38-47.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2008) Communicating Science: Tools for Scientists and Engineers. Communicatingscience.aaas.org/Pages/newmain.aspx, accessed 5 November, 2011.

Blum, D., Knudson, M., and Henig, R.M. (2005) A Field Guide for Science Writers: The Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers. Oxford University Press.

Condit, C. (2007) How geneticists can help reporters to get their story right. Nature Genetics Review, 8(10): 815-820.

Hartz, J. and Chappell, R. (1997) Worlds Apart: How the Distance Between Science and Journalism Threatens America’s Future. Nashville, TN, USA: First Amendment Center.

Rees, M., et al (2006) Science Communication: Survey of Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers. London, UK: Royal Society.

Peters, H.P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigne, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S. and Tsuchida, S. (2008) Science Communication: Interactions with the Mass Media. Science, 321(5886): 204-205.

Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2011) Ethics Codes. www.journalism.org/node/125/print, accessed 5 November, 2011.

Kovach, B and Rosenstiel, T. (2007) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and The Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.

Committee of Concerned Journalists. (2011) A Statement of Shared Purpose. www.concernedjournalists.org/node/380, accessed 5 November, 2011.

Mooney, C. and Kirshenbaum, S. (2009) Unpopular science. The Nation. 17 August: p1.

The World Bank. (2011) Data Indicator: Internet users. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER, accessed 23 January 2012.

Tyrell, P. (2003) Realities of a virtual economy: INTERNET: Online games are taking on a parallel life of their own - spawning trade, exchange rates and regulatory headaches. Financial Times, 29 December: p8.

BBC News (2005) Chinese gamer sentenced to life. 6 August, http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/4072704.stm, accessed 23 January 2012.

O’Reilly, T. (2007) What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies 65(1) 17-37.

Kaplan, A. and Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons. 53(1): 59-68.

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2007) Participative Web and User-created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. ISBN 978-92-64-03746-5.

Genomic Health, Inc. (2010) Pass It On … Until Every Woman Knows. http://www.genomichealth.com/en-us/Company/Perspectives.aspx?id=7678bf31-6698-4a62-9dfe-33f2f4cdcf28, accessed 23 January, 2012.

Wilson, H.J., Guinan, P.J., Parise, S. and Weinberg, B.D. (2011) What’s your social media strategy? Harvard Business Review, 89(7/8): 23-25.

Wikipedia. (2011) Reliability of Wikipedia. Wikipedia entry, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia, accessed 5 November, 2011.

Shaw, D. (2008) Wikipedia in the Newsroom. American Journalism Review 30(10): 40-45.

Messner, M. and South, J. (2011) Legitimizing Wikipedia. Journalism Practice 5(2): 145-160.

Ceccarelli, L. (2011) Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric and Public Debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14(2): 195–228

Baker, S. and Martinson, D.L. (2001) The TARES Test: Five Principles for Ethical Persuasion. Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 16(2&3): 148-175.

Gustin, G. (2010) Seeds of Change? Columbia Journalism Review. 48(5): 47-49.

Downloads

Published

2012-04-01

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2012)

Section

Special Section