Venture Capitalists as gatekeepers for Biotechnological Innovation

Authors

  • Kenneth Fernald Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University
  • Ruud Hoeben
  • Eric Claassen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb704

Keywords:

Venture Capital, Biotechnology, Acquisitions, Innovation

Abstract

Venture capitalists (VCs) aim at trade sales as a preferred exit-strategy for biotechnology companies they invest in. Therefore, VCs pay close attention to the wishes of larger (bio)pharmaceutical acquirers. In this paper we explore VCs’ behavior and strategies by analyzing the technology fields and therapeutic areas in which they are invested most and which yield the highest returns by means of trade sales. The data show that VCs are by far most invested in oncology and this is also an area in which relatively high returns are realized. Regarding other areas, VCs could balance their average investment valuations more in correspondence with what acquirers are willing to pay. In addition, VCs have formidable insight in the types of technologies that do well and they seem to employ a strategy focused on both short-term and long-term success. They are investing most in small molecule drugs and protein/peptide therapeutics, which both yield high returns, followed by DNA/RNA technologies which underlie the possibilities of personalized medicine. We conclude that Venture Capitalists act as technological gatekeepers because they are predicting long-term cure and care macro-trends.

Author Biographies

Kenneth Fernald, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University

is a PhD candidate in Economics at the Department of Applied Economics, the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) with business development experience in life sciences. His educational background is in medical biology and business management in health & life sciences.

 

Ruud Hoeben

is a graduate student (MSc.) Management and Entrepreneurship in health & life sciences at the VU University, with an educational background in biomedical sciences.

Eric Claassen

is a board certified Immunologist and a professor of Knowledge Valorisation in Life Sciences at Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam (since 1994) he is also professor of entrepreneurship in the life sciences at the VU in Amsterdam. In addition, he holds several scientific-advisory-board and non-executive board positions in pharma and biotech companies.

References

Bradford, T. C. (2003) Evolving symbiosis—venture capital and biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 21(9): 983 – 984

EY (2013) Beyond Borders; Matters of evidence. Biotechnology Industry. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Beyond_borders/$FILE/Beyond_borders.pdf

Stewart, J. J., Allison, P. N., & Johnson, R. S. (2001) Putting a price on biotechnology. Nature biotechnology 19(9): 813-818

Lee, D. P. & Dibner, M. D. (2005) The rise of venture capital and biotechnology in the US and Europe. Nature biotechnology 23(6): 672-676

Malik, N. N. (2009) Biotech acquisitions by big pharma: why and what is next. Drug discovery today 14(17): 818-821

Fernald, K., Pennings, E., & Claassen, E. (2014) Biotechnology Commercialization Strategies: Risk and Return in Interfirm Cooperation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, in press.

Giniatullina, A., Boorsma, M., Mulder, G. J. & van Deventer, S. (2013) Building for big pharma. Nature biotechnology 31(4): 284-287

Florida, R. L. & Kenney, M. (1988) Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in the USA. Research Policy 17(3): 119-137

OECD (2005) A Framework for Biotechnology Statistics. http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/34935605.pdf

Van der Valk, T., Moors, E. H. M. & Meeus, M. T. H. (2009) Conceptualizing patterns in the dynamics of emerging technologies: The case of biotechnology developments in the Netherlands Technovation 29(4): 247–264

Kalos, M., & June, C. H. (2013) Adoptive T cell transfer for cancer immunotherapy in the era of synthetic biology. Immunity 39(1): 49-60

Barouch, D. H., & Picker, L. J. (2014) Novel vaccine vectors for HIV-1. Nature Reviews Microbiology 12: 765–771

Mairhofer, J., & Lara, A. R. (2014) Advances in Host and Vector Development for the Production of Plasmid DNA Vaccines. Cancer Vaccines. Springer New York, pp. 505-514

Fernald, K. D. S., Weenen, T. C., Sibley, K. J. & Claassen, E. (2013) Limits of biotechnological innovation. Technology and Investment 4, 168-178

Davis, J. C., Furstenthal, L., Desai, A. A., Norris, T., Sutaria, S., Fleming, E., & Ma, P. (2009) The microeconomics of personalized medicine: today's challenge and tomorrow's promise. Nature reviews Drug discovery 8(4): 279-286

Sander, C. (2000) Genomic medicine and the future of health care. Science 287(5460): 1977-1978

Schilsky, R. L. (2010) Personalized medicine in oncology: the future is now. Nature reviews Drug discovery 9(5): 363-366

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

Issue

Section

Article