Do VC Firms of Different Ownership Structures Exert Heterogeneous Impact on the SMEs’ Profitability?

Authors

  • Xi Yang Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School
  • Su-Sheng Wang Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb813

Keywords:

Venture capital, SMEs, Ownership Structures, Profitability

Abstract

This article is to investigate the heterogeneous effect of Venture Capital?VC, in abbreviated form?on the profitability performance of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs, in abbreviated form) in China, from the perspective of VC firms’ different ownership structures. Our regression results show that the Chinese entrepreneurial firms backed by VC firms can present significantly positive superiority over the non VC backed peers in the performance of profitability; the VC firms can exert the positive impact on the profitability performance of the SMEs. After focusing on the VCs’ characteristics in the ownership structures, it is proven that the foreign VC firms can have the strongest positive impact on the ventures’ profitability performance; the Chinese private VC firms can have the positive impact on the SMEs’ profitability, but the impact is weaker than that of foreign VCs and stronger than that of governmental VC in a positive way; the governmental VC firms exert the significantly negative effect on the ventures’ profitability.

References

Cao J, Liu Q, Tian G G. Do venture capitalists play a monitoring role in an emerging market? Evidence from the pay-performance relationship of Chinese entrepreneurial firms[J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2014,29:121-145.

Di Guo, Kun J. Venture capital investment and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: evidence from China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013,22:375-395.

Liu Z, Chen Z. VENTURE CAPITAL NETWORKS AND INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE IN CHINA[J]. AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2014,53(1-2):97-111.

Bertoni F, Ferrer M A, Martí J. The different roles played by venture capital and private equity investors on the investment activity of their portfolio firms[J]. Small Business Economics, 2013,40(3):607-633.

Cumming D. Adverse selection and capital structure: Evidence from venture capital[J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006,30(2):155-183.

Amit R, Glosten L, Muller E. Entrepreneurial Ability, Venture Investments, And Risk Sharing[J]. Management Science, 1990,36(10):1232-1245.

Lu H, Tan Y, Huang H. Why do venture capital firms exist: An institution-based rent-seeking perspective and Chinese evidence[J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2013,30(3SI):921-936.

Wang L, Wang S. Cross-border venture capital performance: Evidence from China[J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2011,19(1):71-97.

Humphery-Jenner M, Suchard J. Foreign VCs and venture success: Evidence from China[J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2013,21:16-35.

Jia C. China's Venture Capital Guiding Funds: policies and practice[J]. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 2010,2(3):292-297.

Ni H, Luan T, Cao Y, et al. Can venture capital trigger innovation ? New evidence from China[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2014,65(1-4SI):189-214.

Brander J A, Amit R, Antweiler W. Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis[J]. Journal Of Economics & Management Strategy, 2002,11(3):423-452.

Bertoni F, Tykvova T. Does governmental venture capital spur invention and innovation? Evidence from young European biotech companies[J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015,44(4):925-935.

Colombo M G, Cumming D J, Vismara S. Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms[J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016,41(1):10-24.

Grilli L, Murtinu S. Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(9):1523-1543.

Published

2017-07-01

Issue

Section

Article